Basecamp vs monday.com vs ProofHub: Which tool fits your team best?

Introduction

Basecamp and monday.com represent two radically different approaches to project management.

Basecamp believes the best way to manage projects is to strip away complexity until only the essentials remain.

monday.com, on the other hand, gives you the building blocks to construct exactly the system you want.

Both are valid, depending on who you are.

I’ve spent years researching project management software. Most articles about the tools miss the point entirely. They generally compare feature lists and pricing tiers instead of breaking down the tool’s functionality for specific problems. This is like trying to tell someone a property is good by listing its square footage and number of bathrooms without ever discussing what it’s like to live there.

In this comparison of Basecamp vs monday.com, I’ll help you understand what each tool contains and how it shapes how your team works. We’ll look at their features, sure, but more importantly, we’ll examine the core principles and workflow dynamics behind them and what that means for your day-to-day operations. I will be comparing the tools on the grounds of:

• Project management capabilities
• Task management capabilities
• Collaboration features
• Pricing comparison
• Ease-of-use
• Scalability

But what if neither Basecamp nor monday.com fully meets your needs? That’s where  ProofHub comes in as the third alternative. Offering the simplicity of Basecamp and the flexibility of monday.com, ProofHub is a strong alternative for teams looking for an all-in-one tool yet an easy-to-use solution without the burden of per-user pricing. While other tools may offer free plans for up to two users and charge for every additional user, ProofHub provides flat-rate pricing. This means your costs stay the same no matter how much your team grows. 

Here’s a quick overview of Basecamp vs monday.com vs ProofHub comparison:

Pricing
Free plan: Available Basecamp plus: 15/user/month Basecamp pro Unlimited: Flat $299/month	Free for up to 2 users Basic: $9 per user per month (billed annually) Standard: $12 per user per month (billed annually) Pro: $19 per user per month (billed annually) Enterprise: Custom pricing	Essential plan: $45/month flat rate (no per user fee) Ultimate Control: $89/month flat rate (no per user fee) Both plans include unlimited users
Project management
Strong emphasis on simplicity. To-do lists, schedules, docs, and file sharing in one place	Each project is a board with the main table as the primary database Add various column types (text, numbers, status, dates, people, etc.) Project timelines, dependencies, and progress with Gantt and Timeline views (available in higher-tier plans)	Project is the top-order container for every tasklist and related communication Complete toolkit with boards, Gantt charts, and custom workflows, serving both waterfall and agile project management needs Project categories for handling multiple projects Special focus on collaboration tools
Task management
Basic task lists with assignments and due dates Limited advanced features like dependency management or progress tracking	Visual workflow management that emphasizes change in status Custom labels for task prioritization Limited dependency management	Multiple task views, including Gantt charts, support complex projects that require different perspectives Each task can be easily connected to the broader organisation goals Customizable workflows, fields, and reporting for in-depth visualisation
Team collaboration
Built-in pings, message boards, and real-time discussions Group chat “Campfire”	Comments and @mentions monday.com docs for documentation and knowledge sharing Offers communication through third-party integration	Built in Chat, discussions, file proofing, file sharing, real-time updates, and activity tracking
Reporting
Basic progress tracking with hill charts Limited customization options	Extensive, customizable reports and dashboards	Custom reports, time tracking, workload reports, resource reports, activity logs perfect for team accountability
Ease of Use
Intuitive and easy to use Minimal learning curve	Steep learning curve Highly customizable interface, requiring high maintenance Onboarding and training programs	User-friendly, Intuitive design, balances feature richness and accessibility with a moderate learning curve for advanced functions
Scalability
Best for small to medium teams Limited customization	Strong at small to medium scale (teams/projects) Boards can become overwhelming with too many customization Cross-board visibility and alignment get complex	Handles complexity well through multi-level work breakdown structures Flat-rate pricing, no cost increase with team size; adaptable for small to large teams with growth in mind Custom fields and workflows that can be standardized across teams
Ratings
4.3 / 5	4.6 / 5	4.6 / 5
Best for
Remote teams requiring a single source of truth	Teams are comfortable with spreadsheets. Teams seeking advanced customizations	Teams of all sizes: Teams seeking robust tools with flexibility Organisation wide implementation for cross team collaboration, internal communication, and overall work management
Try basecamp for free	Try monday.com for free	Get started with the free trial

What is Basecamp?

Basecamp is project management software that simplifies workflows by providing a unified platform for organizing work, communicating, and sharing updates. It is popular for its simplicity and minimalist design, which is a signature of its philosophy: “Less is more.”

Basecamp was originally developed as an internal solution to streamline the communication at 37 Signals, the parent company. Later, in 2004, they commercialized it as a project management software. Since then, it has been adopted by several teams suffering from information scattered across emails and spreadsheets.

Over the years, Basecamp has maintained its commitment to simplicity, resisting the industry trend of feature overload. Its objective is clear: give teams just what they need to stay organized—nothing more, nothing less. It’s an excellent choice for small businesses, teams, or freelancers. However, some teams find this approach somewhat limiting when handling the complexities of modern businesses. 

Basecamp is an excellent option for those just starting out or looking for a straightforward tool. However, if you anticipate future growth and increasing project complexity, alternatives like ProofHub offer greater flexibility.

What is monday.com?

monday.com is a cloud-based project management software that enables teams to track work and collaborate efficiently via highly interactive databases. The company describes it as a “work operating system,” allowing users to create custom workflows. Essentially, monday.com provides a highly customizable set of interlinked spreadsheets for planning, tracking, and visualizing projects in real-time.

When it launched in 2012 as “daPulse,” many organizations used to rely on spreadsheets and assumed that complexity in project management was a solved problem. However, there was significant demand for customizable workflows. Different teams require different tools—marketing teams work differently from engineering teams.

The founders of monday.com recognized this need and rebranded the product in 2014. While competitors positioned themselves as business management platforms with task management and collaboration tools, monday.com differentiated itself by emphasizing customization.

The functionality, while similar to those in tools like Basecamp, ProofHub, and Trello, is designed to be highly adaptable. Teams that prefer flexible, tailored solutions appreciate monday.com’s configurability. However, some find its “build anything” approach time-consuming and high maintenance, as teams may spend excessive time fine-tuning their setup instead of managing projects.

What is ProofHub?

ProofHub is an all-in-one project management and team collaboration software designed to simplify workflows and improve coordination across teams of all sizes. The platform offers a well-organized and centralized flow of information within projects and teams, reducing friction in collaboration, transparency, and alignment.

ProofHub was founded in 2011 as a proofing tool when the project management and collaboration software market was already growing. The founder, Sandeep Kashyap, noticed something interesting: while most tools focused on improving specific features, teams struggled with disconnected workflows and scattered information. This observation led to the creation of a platform that reduces the friction in how information flows through an organization.

This philosophy shaped ProofHub’s evolution from a simple proofing tool to a comprehensive project management software. Rather than adding features just for the sake of features, the focus remained on making information management more cohesive. The result is an architecture in which projects serve as containers for everything—tasks, files, discussions, and time tracking all exist within a project context, making it natural for teams to find what they need.

While tools like monday.com offer endless customization that can lead to complexity, and Basecamp enforces rigid workflows that can feel limiting, ProofHub takes a balanced approach. Teams can adapt the tools to their needs, but the platform’s design naturally guides users toward efficient customization practices without explicitly forcing them.
The pricing model is another competitive edge—most tools charge per user, which effectively puts constraints on company growth and limits collaboration. ProofHub instead charges a flat price per account regardless of the number of users. This isn’t just about cost-effectiveness. It fundamentally changes how organizations can approach project management by removing barriers to including clients, reshuffling teams, and adapting workflows with respect to any change.

Project management features comparison

Both Basecamp and monday.com offer distinctive features for project management. Basecamp provides tools that are more straightforward, easily accessible, and intuitive for anyone just to dive in and start managing a project. Conversely, monday could be a little demanding when you are just setting up the project. But, once it’s done, the visual aid of dashboards and color-coded labels make it easy to see where things stand. Let’s dive into how each tool can serve your project management needs.

Basecamp

Basecamp’s approach to project management is primarily centered around the idea of more communications and fewer tools. Instead of trying to force work into a rigid project management framework, they built a tool around how teams naturally communicate and coordinate. The following functionalities and features characterize the tool: 

Consistent project structuring: Basecamp offers a dedicated space for each of your projects. You start by naming your project, adding team members, and setting a due date. Each project appears as a separate card containing all related files, communication, and relevant tools, which you can enable or disable based on your preference.

Message boards: Message boards are the primary tools for discussing topics and dynamically planning the project. Basecamp subtly encourages team members to communicate more thoughtfully and collaboratively identify tasks as the project progresses.

Hill Charts: Basecamp deliberately limits how you can visualize project progress. Instead of using quantitative metrics like percentage completion rates, it categorizes tasks as uphill (still figuring things out) or downhill (under execution). This approach provides a clearer picture of which aspects of the project are well-defined and which remain uncertain.

LineUp tool: Basecamp recently introduced the LineUp view, which displays all your projects over a 13-week period. This allows you to see what worked well in the past six weeks and what is planned for the next six weeks.

Project templates: When creating a project, you can save it as a template for quicker setup in the future. For example, if your marketing team follows the same project management framework each quarter, they won’t have to start from scratch every time.

Calendar: The Schedule tool aggregates deadlines, meetings, and milestones into a shared calendar that syncs with Google Calendar, iCal, or Outlook. This helps prevent scheduling conflicts and provides a macro-level view of project timelines.

Pros

• A simple, straightforward interface for handling multiple projects simultaneously.
• Takes just a few minutes to set up the project
• Supports integration with multiple tools 

Cons

• No Gantt charts to set dependencies across tasks
• Only shows tasks as either “to-do” or “done”
• Lacks reporting and resource management features

monday.com

monday.com’s approach to project management is more focused on custom building your own project management system. Unlike Basecamp, monday.com does not restrict the users to set restrictions on how they want to manage their projects. The platform offers the following building blocks for project management:

Workspaces: Workspaces are the highest-order containers for structuring your project on monday.com. Each workspace can contain multiple boards, projects, docs, and other relevant files.

Board structure: In monday.com, you can create a new board for each of your projects within your workspace. Each board contains the primary operational interface, the main table view, which acts as a database for everything. Each row in this table represents an item being tracked, and each column represents a property of that item. The same data can be viewed as a Kanban board, timeline, calendar, or chart.

Note:  If you set one board as the interface for your entire project, it will contain a single comprehensive task list that follows a similar workflow. If different workflows are essential, create separate boards for each workflow (e.g., “Product Development,” “Bug Tracking,” “Marketing Campaigns”). You can then link related tasks between boards.

Dashboards: Every workspace includes a default dashboard that consolidates data from various boards. Real-time reports and insights are displayed in these dashboards. Additionally, you can incorporate prebuilt widgets to monitor specific elements.

Project templates: monday.com offers a comprehensive library of prebuilt templates. Whenever you create a new board, the main table is automatically set up based on the relevant aspect you are working on. For example, if you make a board to manage employees, the columns are automatically configured to track relevant metrics.

Gantt Charts: The Gantt chart is a relatively new feature in monday.com, and some essential functionalities, such as baseline and critical path highlight, are still in beta testing. However, a notable limitation is that dependencies cannot be set up unless a dedicated field for dependencies exists in the main table. For a Gantt chart to effectively accommodate real-time changes, it needs to be interactive, like the one that ProofHub offers.

Workflow automation: monday.com provides various automation options to streamline workflows. Some automation is prebuilt, such as notifying person A when task B is completed or sending task reminders. Tools like ProofHub, however, offer these as built-in notification features rather than labelling them as automation.

Additionally, monday.com allows users to set up custom automation by defining triggers (when something happens), conditions (if certain conditions are met), and resulting actions (then do these things). The challenge is that as you increase automation, you also introduce more rules that require maintenance. Over time, as project complexity grows, workarounds may become necessary.

Pros

• Highly customizable platform that allows you to build workflows tailored to your specific needs
• Status-centric visualization: Every item can be tracked quantitatively and displayed across dashboards and reports
• Workflow automation reduces repetitive tasks

Cons

• New users often struggle to set up workflows efficiently
• Teams may waste time tweaking boards instead of executing tasks
• Requires training to avoid underutilizing features

ProofHub

ProofHub’s approach to project management centres on reducing complexity and improving collaboration. Rather than forcing teams to use multiple specialized tools, it consolidates essential features into a unified platform where planning, collaboration, and delivery coexist naturally. The platform removes unnecessary complications by offering intuitive project organization with the flexibility to adapt to any methodology. 

Project Organization: Each project exists in a centralized space with customizable views and a transparent ownership structure. Unlike other platforms, ProofHub implements a category-based organization system, allowing teams to group projects by client, department, or type, significantly reducing time spent searching for specific projects.

Visual project planning: ProofHub offers interactive Gantt charts to represent project timelines and dependencies. This feature proves particularly valuable for complex projects where task relationships and dynamic timeline adjustments are crucial for project success.

Workflow customization: The platform provides fully customizable workflows that adapt to different team processes without additional costs. Teams can create tailored task stages that match their specific needs, whether they’re managing a development sprint or a content marketing campaign.

Discussion and collaboration: Project discussion boards serve as centralized communication hubs where teams can share updates, files, and feedback. The platform maintains a complete activity log, ensuring transparency and accountability throughout the project lifecycle.

Progress tracking: ProofHub provides comprehensive project monitoring through milestones and detailed reporting tools. Teams can track completion rates, resource allocation, and overall project performance through data-driven insights.

Resource management: ProofHub includes built-in time tracking and workload management features, helping project managers allocate resources effectively and prevent team burnout. These tools provide real-time visibility into team capacity and project demands.

Pros

• A unified platform eliminates the need for multiple tools
• No per-user pricing, making it cost-effective for growing teams
• Comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities
• Flexible workflow customization without additional costs

Cons

• Mobile app functionality needs improvement
• Interface prioritizes functionality over modern design aesthetics

Task management features comparison

At its core, managing tasks is about keeping track of what needs to be done, who’s doing it, and when it needs to be finished. It’s like organizing a big family event – you need to know who’s bringing what, by when, and how all the pieces fit together. Let’s see how each tool helps you organize and track your team’s work

Basecamp

Task management in Basecamp is straightforward but lacks depth. You can check off completed tasks and see who was responsible for each one, but your task can only exist as a to-do or done The absence of features like custom workflows means that every team is constrained to a specific way of working. Here is the list of key task management features Basecamp offers:

To-do lists: Basecamp’s primary task management tool is the to-do list. You can create task lists within each project space and assign them to team members with specified due dates and task descriptions.

Group To-Dos: It allows you to cluster related tasks together under one heading for better organization. You can choose whether you want to arrange tasks based on the assessment or the nature of the tasks. 

HEY!: “Hey!” in Basecamp is a notification panel that automatically collects all the notifications. Users have the option to unsubscribe from irrelevant notifications and focus on what matters to them. 

Card table: The card table is the Kanban board version of Basecamp. You get two sections. In the top section, called “triage,” by default,  you can enter all your ideas or to-dos as cards. When you are ready to execute, just drag and drop the card to your set workflow on the board. 

Multiple owners for tasks: Tasks or cards can now have multiple owners, making it easy for two or more team members to work on corresponding subtasks independently. 

Pros

• Simplified task management with a clean interface
• Direct messaging that helps reduce email overload
• Mixed pricing model catering to different team sizes

Cons

• Limited customization options compared to monday.com
• Lack reporting capabilities 
• No built-in time tracking features, requiring third-party tools for teams that need this functionality

monday.com

monday.com task management capabilities extend far beyond the to-do list Basecamp has to offer. monday.com follows the spreadsheet’s core functionality of tracking individual items based on data. monday.com is a dynamic work operating system designed for clarity, collaboration, and adaptability. It structures workflows like building blocks, allowing teams to visualize, plan, and execute tasks seamlessly. With a balance of structure and flexibility, it transforms scattered processes into a unified, transparent, and scalable workspace for any team.

Board types: monday.com offers three board types with different access levels. Main boards are visible to all team members; shareable boards allow external guests and Private boards restrict access to invited users. Board types can be changed by the owner via board settings on desktop or mobile, ensuring flexible collaboration.

Main table view: The Main Table View serves as the default layout, providing a spreadsheet-like structure where users can track tasks, owners, deadlines, and statuses in a clear, customizable format. 

Kanban view: For teams that prefer a more visual workflow, the Kanban View organizes tasks into columns based on status, making it easy to move items through different stages of completion.

Dependencies: Task relationships can be managed using Dependencies, though they must be entered manually. This feature helps users link tasks that rely on one another, ensuring that dependent work does not begin before prerequisites are completed.

Dashboards: Dashboards offer a high-level overview of project progress by compiling data from multiple boards. Users can track workload, deadlines, and key performance metrics through customizable widgets.

Automation: monday.com includes automations that reduce manual work. Status change notifications alert users when task progress updates, keeping everyone informed. Additional automations include dependency-based status changes, recurring tasks, etc.

Pros

• Highly customizable depending on the nature of the tasks
• Automation handles the repetitive stuff
• Familiarity with spreadsheet software

Cons

• It can get pricey with more users
• Too many customizations can overwhelm
• Some features are only available in higher-tier plans

ProofHub

ProofHub’s task management capabilities strike an impressive balance between robustness and ease of use, offering you a more intuitive experience than monday.com while providing deeper functionality than Basecamp. When you first engage with ProofHub’s task management system, you’ll immediately notice its adaptability to different work styles because of the customization options you will find. 

You can create tasks from the Tasks section using a quick-add method for rapid task entry or a detailed process for comprehensive task information. The quick-add method allows you to enter basic task details like name, due date, attachments, labels, and assignments in succession while retaining previously entered values for efficiency. The detailed method provides an entire task window where you can specify additional information, including descriptions, start dates, estimated time, and file attachments. For larger projects, ProofHub also supports bulk task import.

Task views: ProofHub offers versatile task visualization options for different working styles and project needs. You can switch between list view for a straightforward overview, Kanban boards for agile workflow management, and Gantt charts for timeline-based planning. This flexibility proves particularly valuable when managing complex projects where different team members prefer different views of the same information.

Custom labels: The labeling system allows you to create and manage custom priority levels and categories that make sense for your specific workflow. You can easily tag tasks with multiple labels, making it simple to filter and organize work based on various criteria. The ability to link labels to milestones adds another layer of organization, helping you track progress toward larger project goals.

Custom fields: You can tailor task information to your team’s specific needs by creating custom fields. These fields can capture any additional information you need to track, from budget allocations to content status. The custom fields integrate seamlessly with ProofHub’s reporting tools, allowing you to generate insights based on the parameters that matter most to your team.

Subtasks and recurring tasks: Complex tasks can be broken down into manageable subtasks, making it easier to track progress and delegate work effectively. The recurring tasks feature automates the creation of repetitive tasks, saving time and ensuring consistency in regular processes. Unlike Basecamp, you can easily set up dependencies between tasks and subtasks to ensure work flows logically.

Task dependencies: The Gantt chart lets you establish transparent relationships between tasks, ensuring work is completed in the right order. You can set both finish-to-start and start-to-finish dependencies, which helps prevent bottlenecks and keeps projects moving smoothly. This feature is handy when managing complex projects with interconnected deliverables.

Time tracking: Built-in time tracking capabilities include both manual timesheets and automatic timers. Team members can quickly log time against specific tasks, and managers can generate detailed reports to analyze productivity and resource allocation. The system integrates seamlessly with the task management features, providing valuable insights into how time is spent across projects.

Pros

• Every task view shows the same complete information, no matter how you get to it
• Custom workflows with as many stages provide detailed progress
• All task details (comments, files, time logs) stay in one place

Cons

• No automations. However, you get notifications automatically

Collaboration features comparison 

Working together effectively means more than just sharing files. It’s about how well people can communicate, share ideas, give feedback, and stay in the loop about what everyone else is doing. Like having a good conversation, the right tools can make teamwork feel natural and easy. Let’s explore how each platform helps your team work together.

Basecamp

Basecamp offers a range of tools designed to streamline communication, enhance productivity, and foster collaboration across teams. Below is an overview of its key features, alongside recent updates that make it an even more robust platform for project management:

Pings: The direct messaging feature works great for one-on-one conversations. You can use it to discuss quick updates or address sensitive issues without involving the entire team. 

Message Board: I love how the Message Board keeps discussions organized by topic. When my team tackles multi-phase projects, having a dedicated space for each discussion prevents information from getting lost in chats or emails. That said, I sometimes wish it had more formatting options to make posts visually engaging.

Docs & Files: The centralized repository for documents has been a game-changer. I no longer waste time hunting for the latest versions of files, as everything is stored in one place with clear version history. However, it can feel limiting compared to tools like Google Drive when editing documents collaboratively in real time.

Automatic Check-ins: These scheduled prompts are great for encouraging regular updates without needing extra meetings. I use them to gather feedback or track progress on ongoing tasks. Yet, they can feel redundant if not carefully tailored to the team’s actual needs.

Calendar: The shared calendar is a practical tool for staying on top of deadlines and events. I’ve had success integrating it with Google Calendar to manage my personal and team schedules seamlessly. However, I’ve noticed it struggles a bit when coordinating across multiple time zones or complex timelines.

However, I’ve found that it’s not ideal for more complex topics that would benefit from being documented elsewhere for broader visibility.

monday.com

monday.com is often recognized for its project management capabilities in the software development environment. However, it is equally robust for collaboration across different teams. The unified interface approach of monday.com, where you can access all the views from one single page, improves collaboration among teams by providing a holistic view of all the ongoing projects and tasks. Here’s an outline of its collaborative features:

Docs: Being able to have discussions directly within issues is incredibly helpful. It ensures all relevant conversations stay in context, which has saved me from scouring through email threads for details. Sometimes, though, these threads can become cluttered, making it harder to extract actionable insights.

Notifications: monday.com keeps you informed with customizable notifications. Setting up filters to prioritize important updates ensures you are not bombarded with irrelevant alerts. Still, fine-tuning these settings can be a bit tedious.

Integration with other tools: The seamless linking of project documentation to monday.com issues has been a lifesaver. When working on tasks that require detailed background or supporting data, you can instantly access relevant Confluence pages without switching tools.

Linked boards: Attaching pages or other documents directly to issues simplifies team workflows. This feature has made it easier to onboard new team members, as they can quickly access everything they need in one place. Occasionally, though, I have encountered minor glitches when syncing attachments.

Team calendars: Calendars are instrumental in planning sprints around team availability and major events. It’s great for ensuring everyone is on the same page.

ProofHub

ProofHub is designed to make teamwork and collaboration easier and more organized. Think of it like a digital workspace where every piece of information is well organized to make coordination of efforts easier and more effective. It has several collaboration features to seamlessly unify all your communication, project planning, task management, conflict resolution, and more. Unlike monday.com, which relies on distinct integrations for knowledge management and communication, in ProofHub, you get everything under one virtual roof.  Whether you’re working with your team, clients, or remote collaborators, ProofHub helps you stay on the same page, reduce confusion, and get work done faster.

Centralized discussion: ProofHub gives your team dedicated spaces to talk about projects and tasks. On the discussion board, you can add subscribers and keep all your conversations related to one topic in one place, so you don’t have to deal with long email threads or scattered chats. For instance, you can use it to plan a project, document every update, share files, etc. 

Proofing and review tools: With ProofHub, you can review files, images, and documents directly in the app. Team members can add comments or mark changes on files in real-time. Version control makes it easy to track updates, so you always know which is the latest version. This speeds up approvals and reduces back-and-forth.

Chat and in-task comments: ProofHub keeps conversations contextual with in-built chat and task-specific comments. Team members can have quick discussions in chat for instant updates or feedback while keeping detailed task-related conversations right where they belong – within the tasks themselves. This dual approach ensures that essential discussions don’t get lost, and team members can easily follow the context of any conversation, whether it’s a quick check-in or detailed task feedback.

Custom roles and access control: You can control who sees what in ProofHub by setting roles and permissions. This means your team, clients, and contractors only access what’s relevant to them. It’s a simple way to protect sensitive information while still keeping collaboration smooth.

Time tracking and workload management: ProofHub helps you track how much time tasks take and see how workloads are distributed across your team. This makes it easier to allocate resources, avoid burnout, and meet deadlines without overloading anyone.

What sets ProofHub apart is its organic integration of essential collaboration features. Rather than cobbling together multiple specialized tools, teams get a cohesive environment where work flows naturally. It particularly shines in mixed environments involving internal teams, remote workers, and external clients by creating a unified workspace where tasks, discussions, and files coexist logically. ProofHub reduces meeting overload by providing clear visibility into project progress and team activities, i.e.,  more doing and less updating.

Pricing comparison 

Pricing can be a significant determinant when choosing between Basecamp and monday.com. Both tools offer different pricing models with different constraints. Here’s each platform’s approach to pricing. 



Basecamp

Basecamp offers three pricing options: Free, Plus, and Pro Unlimited, with 30 days and 75-day free trial on respective paid plans. 

Basecamp free

Price: $0

• Suitable for personal use or a tiny team.
• Includes all essential features 



Constraints

• You can only work on one project at a time
• Only 1 GB of storage space is available
• No admin control 
• 
Suitable for personal projects or to get the basic feel of Basecamp.

Basecamp Plus 

Suitable per-user pricing for dynamic teams

Price: Starts at $15 per user per month (billed monthly)

• No charge for client or guest access
• Unlimited projects
• 500 GB storage

Constraints

• Need to pay extra for time tracking, timesheet, and Admin pro pack
• No annual subscription option

Basecamp Pro Unlimited

Suitable for medium-sized businesses or fast-growing teams. 

Price: $299 per month when billed annually (or $349 per month if billed monthly)

• Unlimited projects
• 5 TB of storage
• Priority support
• Administrative controls
• Personal onboarding with Basecamp expert

Constraints

• The $299/month price point makes it less economical if you have a small team.
• Other tools offer all this and more for a lesser price point. 

monday.com

monday.com offers a four-tiered pricing structure: Basic, Standard, Pro, and Enterprise. Pricing is based on the number of “seats”, a commonly used method of loss aversion used by several tools in the project management and collaboration tool industry. Several critical features are gated behind a higher-tier paywall, making upgrades necessary as your projects scale. Here’s the complete breakdown of monday’s pricing:



Free

Suitable for personal task management and tracking

Price: $0

• Add Up to 2 seats
• Unlimited docs
• Access to 200+ templates


Constraints

• Offers very limited features
• Only offers three boards
• No timeline or Gantt views
• Not suitable for team collaboration

Basic

Suitable for: Managing all your team’s work in one place

Price: $9/seat/month 

• Unlimited free viewers 
• Unlimited items 
• 5GB file storage 
• Prioritized customer support 

Constraints: 

• Limited storage: 5GB 
• Limited dashboard capabilities (1/board)
• Lacks advanced features

Standard

Suitable for: Collaborating & optimizing your work across teams1

Price: $12/seat/month 

• Timeline & Gantt views 
• Calendar View 
• Guest access 
• Automation (250 actions per month) 
• Integrations (250 actions per month) 
• Create a dashboard that combines 5 boards    

Constraints

• Limited automation (250/month) 
• Limited integrations (250/month)1

Pro plan

Suitable for: Streamlining complex workflows at scale

Price: $19/seat/month 

•  Private boards
• Chart View
• Time tracking
• Formula Column1
• Automation (25K actions per month)

Constraints

• Integrations (25K actions per month)
• Create a dashboard that combines 20 boards
• Higher cost per user might be excessive for simpler needs

Enterprise

Suitable for: Organizations requiring enterprise-grade features and support

Price: Quote-based; contact sales

• Enterprise-scale automation & integrations (250K actions per month)
• Multi-level permissions
• Enterprise-grade security & governance 
• Advanced reporting & analytics
• Enterprise support
• Create a dashboard that combines 50 boards

Constraints 

• Most expensive
• Designed only for large organizations with complex needs

ProofHub

ProofHub offers a flat-rate pricing model with no-per-user fee or user limits, making it cost-effective for teams of all sizes. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Essential

Price: Flat $45/month for unlimited users (billed annually)

• All core project management tools
• Time tracking and Proofing
• 15GB storage
• 40 projects
• Unlimited users

Ultimate Control

Price: Flat $89/month for unlimited users (billed annually)

All Essential features

• Custom roles/permissions, white-labeling, and API access
• Advanced workflows, reports, and time sheets
• 100GB storage.
• Unlimited projects and unlimited users.

ProofHub is the best option out there for teams seeking predictable costs without per-user fees. The flat-rate structure benefits growing organizations aiming to control expenses while scaling.

Scalability & Ease-of-use comparison

Scalability is the ability of software to handle growth and increase in complexity while maintaining its optimal functionality. Basecamp and monday.com have different architectural designs and, hence, offer a bit different approaches to scalability. Let’s understand these differences in detail:

Basecamp

Basecamp takes a radical approach to scalability with a hierarchical database structure. It’s built on the principle of organized simplicity – a to-do task list being the fundamental item. A relational database backs this structure. However, Basecamp’s scalability is intentionally constrained by design. Their architecture prioritizes fixed data models and predetermined workflows. While this makes it highly efficient for small to medium teams, it becomes restrictive as organizations grow. The system doesn’t allow for complex customizations or extensive workflow variations, which larger organizations often require.

For user growth, Basecamp handles up to several hundred users efficiently through its simple permissions model – users are either in or out of projects with essential admin/non-admin roles. However, this simplicity becomes problematic when organizations need granular access controls or complex role hierarchies.

For project growth, Basecamp manages through its folder-like structure – projects contain to-dos, docs, and discussions. While it can handle hundreds of projects, it lacks sophisticated cross-project management capabilities. When organizations start having interconnected projects or need to track dependencies across multiple teams, Basecamp’s structure becomes limiting. 

The system starts showing strain when:

• Teams need customized workflows beyond basic task management
• Projects require complex approval chains or conditional workflows
• Organizations need detailed resource allocation across multiple projects
• Teams require advanced reporting across multiple projects
• Projects have complex dependencies or milestone tracking needs

monday.com

monday.com approaches scalability through its unique “building block” architecture. Their system is built on a flexible data model where each board is essentially a customizable database table that can be viewed and manipulated in multiple ways. The system scales horizontally – new boards can be created and linked together to handle growing complexity. The underlying architecture uses a combination of relational databases to manage different types of data efficiently.  

monday.com handles user scaling through customizable teams and spaces, supporting thousands of users with different permission levels and workspace access. The board-based structure allows for extensive customization of workflows and data organization. However, its pricing tiers effectively create practical scalability barriers. Organizations must upgrade to higher tiers to remove these constraints, making pricing a direct factor in how effectively they can scale their project management capabilities.

For project complexity, monday faces challenges when:

• Organizations implement too many complex workflows. The system can slow down, as highlighted by several users on in this discussion.  
• Teams create numerous cross-board dependencies. More dependencies you create, more sluggish the platform becomes. You change something small, and the whole system shudders. That’s when you realize the beast you’ve created.
• Projects require sophisticated resource management across multiple boards. Moreover, the cost hits you in ways you never saw coming. You need people just to manage the system now. 
• Teams require advanced project management functionalities. For example: Optimising large boards with multiple formula columns and automations will cost extra in time it require to manage the already existing system. 

The freedom to scale monday.com gives is real, but it comes at price. Someone has to be there, watching, fixing, making sure the messages keep moving between monday.com and all the other tools your teams can’t live without. The real trouble comes when you try to change course. By then, your workflows are set like concrete. Teams have built their processes around custom boards and complex automations. Making a big change becomes like trying to renovate a house while people are living in it. You can do it, but nobody’s going to be happy about it.

ProofHub

ProofHub takes a coordinated suite approach to scalability. The architecture is built around distinct hierarchical elements (projects> tasks> files>reporting). This modular design allows each component to scale separately based on usage patterns, reducing the load on the overall framework. The system uses a combination of relational databases for structured data. This approach provides consistent performance as organizations grow. While it might lack advanced-level automation, ProofHub offers ample flexibility for organizations to grow.

The flat pricing model with no per-user fee also contributes to scalability. Users don’t need to upgrade plans or make organizational changes. Add new users anytime, set their roles, responsibilities, and permissions, and continue working productively.

The system excels at:

• Managing multiple projects with customized workflows
• Handling document reviews and approvals
• Tracking time and resources across projects
• Maintaining organized file structures across multiple projects. 

However, ProofHub shows limitations when:

•  Teams require complex workflow automation
• Organizations need extensive third-party integration. However, several project management and collaboration functionalities are already built in ProofHub. 

In a nutshell, the scalability that each tool offers depends directly on the type of architecture it provides. Basecamp optimizes for organizational clarity at the cost of flexibility. monday.com offers flexible building blocks that can become complex to manage at scale. ProofHub provides a robust approach through modular design but with less automation potential. 

Which tool is best for your team

Every team needs a project management tool, but the right choice depends on how your team works. Some teams thrive on flexibility, while others need structure. Some need advanced portfolio management, while others only need simple task tracking. The best tool is the one that fits your workflow without adding unnecessary complexity.

1. Workflow customization

• Best for maximum flexibility: monday.com– highly visual workflows, customizable columns, and automation
• Best for standardized workflows: Basecamp– rigid structure, minimal customization. 
• Balanced option: ProofHub– More customization than Basecamp, but less than monday.com. Good for structured workflows with some flexibility task dependency. Automated notifications- useful for complex project scheduling. 

2. Managing multiple projects

• Best for complex portfolios: monday.com– Advanced cross-project reporting and resource allocation, making it ideal for teams handling multiple initiatives. 
• Best for small teams and simple projects: Basecamp– not designed for managing complex project portfolios
• Middle ground: ProofHub– Supports multiple projects but lacks monday.com advanced reporting.

3. Team communication

• Best for structured, asynchronous work: Basecamp- Message boards and to-do comments (great for distributed teams).
• Best for quick, built-in chat: ProofHub- Includes a chat feature for real-time discussions

4. Activity Logs & Comments

monday.com- No built-in chat; requires Slack or Teams for messaging.

• monday.com has activity logs and comment sections, but it’s not built for real-time chat. If your team relies on instant messaging, you’ll need a separate tool like Slack or Microsoft Teams. 
• Basecamp takes a different approach, prioritizing asynchronous communication through message boards and to-do comments. It’s ideal for distributed teams or those that prefer structured, non-intrusive communication. 
• ProofHub offers a built-in chat feature, making it a convenient option for teams that need quick discussions without switching to another tool. However, if real-time messaging is central to your workflow, you should assess whether its chat functionality is robust enough.

5. Client access & permissions

• Best for client collaboration: Basecamp– Clients can track progress, participate in discussions, and approve deliverables.
• Best for customizable access: ProofHub– Guest users with permission control (but not as flexible as monday.com).
• Most flexible permissions: monday.com– Granular access controls for different user roles.

6. Document Management

• Best for built-in version control: ProofHub– Tracks document history and changes.
• Best for simple storage: Basecamp– offers document storage with a basic version history.
• Best for cloud integrations: monday– offers Google Drive & Dropbox integrations, but no native version control.

7. Integrations & API Support

• Best for customization & automation: monday. Com– Strong API + marketplace of integrations.
• Best for simplicity: Basecamp– Limited API and fewer integrations.
• Decent integrations: ProofHub– More than Basecamp but less than monday.com.

Conclusion

Project management challenges are deeply contextual. A 5-person startup has radically different project management needs than a 500-person enterprise. A software company’s workflows look nothing like a marketing agency’s. The best choice comes down to how your team operates.

If you need maximum flexibility and automation, monday.com is the right fit. If you prefer simplicity and a structured workflow, Basecamp is the better option. If you need a middle ground with strong task dependencies and built-in communication, ProofHub offers a balanced approach.

FAQs